Review process

We have a careful review process to make sure that we are supporting high quality projects​.

Independent reviewers
Stage 2 applications are assessed by independent expert (or ‘peer’) review. While peer review is most associated with academic research, we use independent reviewers across all our programmes. They are selected as experts in their field who can provide an informed and impartial review. This process is central to our decision-making, and we are very grateful to all our reviewers.

The identity of our independent expert reviewers is kept confidential. If reviewers have questions or concerns, we will pass these on to you, and you will have the chance to respond.

Read our guidance for reviewers.

Nominated reviewers
You can nominate a reviewer, who should be someone who is familiar with the organisation and project but who can provide an independent reference.

Expert Panel and assessment criteria
Our expert panels consider applications, reviewers’ comments and any response from applicants to queries raised. The panel then make recommendations to our trustees.

Trustees assess applications using criteria including the excellence of the organisation and project, the anticipated outcome of the project, and financial viability, including value for money and provision for ongoing costs or maintenance.